GetBaseItemDtos already batch fetches user data, child counts, played counts
and artists before its per item loop, but AttachPeople still ran one GetPeople
query per item. Rendering a page of items (for example a large playlist) fired
one extra query per row.
Add GetPeopleByItems to IPeopleRepository, which reads every requested item in a
single query over the people mapping table and returns full PersonInfo (role,
type and sort order) grouped by item id. GetBaseItemDtos prefetches this once
when the People field is requested and passes it into AttachPeople, which reads
from the batch instead of querying per item. The single item GetBaseItemDto path
keeps its existing per item behaviour when no batch is supplied.
Adds a DtoService test asserting people resolve from the batch and the per item
GetPeople is never called.
This makes the deletion of BaseItemProviders, BaseItemImageInfos, and BaseItemMetadataFields happen in batch as a contiguous block so the lock isn't held across items, just before the bulk SaveChanges.
`GetItemValues` -- the shared path behind `/Artists`, `/AlbumArtists`, `/Genres`,
`/MusicGenres` and `/Studios` -- disabled the total record count whenever the
query carried no `Limit`:
if (!filter.Limit.HasValue)
{
filter.EnableTotalRecordCount = false;
}
A request without an explicit limit therefore came back with N entries in `Items`
and `TotalRecordCount = 0`. Clients that page on the reported total -- the
documented contract every other list endpoint honours -- read that as an empty
library. `/Items` and `/Persons` do not share this path and report the count
correctly, which is what makes the inconsistency visible from the outside.
Measured against master with a 62-track music library:
GET /Artists?UserId=... -> TotalRecordCount=0 Items=5
GET /Artists?UserId=...&limit=100 -> TotalRecordCount=5 Items=5
Dropping the block costs nothing: `representativeIds` is materialised into a
`List<Guid>` a few lines below regardless, so `.Count` was already available and
the count is now reported from it. Callers that genuinely want to skip the count
still can -- `EnableTotalRecordCount = false` is honoured as before.
The block also mutated the caller's own query object, so a query instance reused
across calls silently lost its total after the first limitless one. That is
covered by a test as well.
Cody Robibero