A new VaultStaticSecret `ceph-mediafs-secret` in ns `csi-cephfs` (for the legacy mediafs CephFS static PV) gets 403 on `kv/data/service/kubernetes/au/syd1/csi/ceph-mediafs-secret` — the `ceph-csi` role can already read the sibling `ceph-cephfs-secret` path via the same `ceph-csi-cephfs` VaultAuth, but no policy covers the new path.
- Adds `policies/kv/service/kubernetes/au/syd1/csi/ceph-mediafs-secret/read.yaml` granting read on `kv/data/service/kubernetes/au/syd1/csi/ceph-mediafs-secret`, bound to role `ceph-csi` on mount `k8s/au/syd1` (mirrors the existing ceph-cephfs-secret/ceph-rbd-secret policies)
Reviewed-on: #132
Co-authored-by: unkin-agent <unkin-agent@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: unkin-agent <unkin-agent@unkin.net>
## Why
The `terraform-vault` master apply aborts because the KV path `kv/data/service/vault/au/syd1/secret_backend/ghp/config` (key `admin_token`, a `ghpsvc_` service token) is unseeded. The ghp secrets engine reads that value at `ghp/config` creation time, so the ghp data-source read fails and the apply stops. Granting the `agents` AppRole scoped write to just this one KV path lets an agent seed the value so the apply can proceed.
## Changes
- Add `policies/kv/service/vault/au/syd1/secret_backend/ghp/config_write.yaml`, a `vault_policy` bound to the `agents` AppRole role only.
- Grant `create`, `update`, `read` on the kv-v2 data path `kv/data/service/vault/au/syd1/secret_backend/ghp/config`.
- Grant `read` on the kv-v2 metadata path `kv/metadata/service/vault/au/syd1/secret_backend/ghp/config` (read on plan/apply).
- Scope to this single ghp config path only; no wildcards, no delete, no list, no other `secret_backend` configs (least privilege).
## Caveat
This grant is itself a `vault_policy` applied by the master apply, which currently aborts on the ghp data-source read. So the policy likely needs to be applied first (a targeted apply of just this `vault_policy`) before the agent can seed the KV path. The agent also still needs the actual `ghpsvc_` service token value provided out-of-band to write into `admin_token`.
---------
Co-authored-by: BenVincent <benvin@main.unkin.net>
Co-authored-by: unkin-agent <agent@unkin.net>
Reviewed-on: #128
Co-authored-by: Unkin Agent <unkin-agent@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Unkin Agent <unkin-agent@unkin.net>
## Why
Grants the Vault access the arrstack engine needs, before any engine resources exist. **PR 2 of 3 (policy)**, stacked on #125 (register). Keeping policy separate from resources honours the never-bundle / sequential-apply rule.
## Change
- Adds `policies/arrstack/admin.yaml`: the terraform-vault deployer (`tf_vault` approle + `woodpecker_terraform_vault` k8s role) may create/read/update/delete `arrstack/config` and manage `arrstack/roles/*`.
- Adds `policies/kv/kubernetes/namespace/arrstack/default/arrproxy-admin-token/read.yaml`: the deployer may read the KV-seeded arrproxy admin token (both `kv/data/...` and `kv/metadata/...`) that the engine config sources. The existing `secret_backends_read` policy does not cover this `kubernetes/namespace` KV path.
- Adds `policies/arrstack/creds/{sonarr,radarr,prowlarr}.yaml`: each `terraform-<app>` run may read its own `arrstack/creds/<app>` to mint a scoped key.
- Policy YAMLs are auto-discovered by `policies/policies.hcl`, so no wiring changes are needed.
## Apply order
Apply **after PR #125 (register)**. Safe to apply before the engine exists — these only grant capabilities on paths.
## Stack
1. register -> #125
2. **policy (this PR)** -> `benvin/arrstack-policy` off `benvin/arrstack-register`
3. resources -> `benvin/arrstack-resources`
Supersedes #124.
Reviewed-on: #126
Co-authored-by: unkin-agent <unkin-agent@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: unkin-agent <unkin-agent@unkin.net>
Why: step 2 of the ordered ghp plugin add (install via puppet -> **this policy** -> resources). The terraform apply identities (tf_vault / woodpecker_terraform_vault) need create/update on ghp/config + ghp/roles/* BEFORE the engine resources are applied — an approle token capability set is fixed at login, so the grant must be effective in a prior apply or writing ghp/config is permission-denied.
How: split out of #121 — policies/ghp/admin.yaml (deployer: ghp/config + ghp/roles/*) and policies/ghp/creds/agent.yaml (agents approle: read ghp/creds/agent).
Order: puppet-prod#520 (install plugin) -> **this** -> #121 (resources).
Reviewed-on: #122
Co-authored-by: unkin-agent <unkin-agent@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: unkin-agent <unkin-agent@unkin.net>
## Why
netbox_user_management authenticates to NetBox to reconcile service users + permissions on every apply. It must not depend on a second static admin token, and it must not break when the engine rotates its admin seed (`netbox/config/rotate` mints a fresh admin token and deletes the old one). The durable shape: keep exactly ONE static admin token, and have the netbox engine mint an ephemeral, user-admin-capable token that the e-breuninger provider uses to manage users.
## How
- `module.netbox_user_mgmt_role` creates `netbox/roles/vault-user-mgmt`, a write-enabled role for a pre-existing NetBox superuser named by `user_mgmt_username`. Minted tokens authenticate AS that superuser (NetBox tokens carry no scope beyond `write_enabled`; the user's permissions apply), so they can create users.
- `netbox_user_management` reads `netbox/creds/vault-user-mgmt` and configures the netbox provider with the minted token. When `user_mgmt_username` is unset it falls back to the single static `admin_token` (a `check` block warns that rotation would then break it) - a bootstrap/degraded path, never a second static token.
- Grant the deployer `read` on `netbox/creds/vault-user-mgmt` (the one deliberate exception to the admin policy's `netbox/creds/*` exclusion).
- Keep the bare-token + `token_version`-match postconditions on the single static admin token.
## Feasibility constraints (worked through, documented in-module)
1. **The engine CAN mint a user-admin token** - roles map to a pre-existing user with only a `write_enabled` gate (`vault-plugin-secrets-netbox` `path_roles.go`, `client.go` `MintToken`); point it at a superuser and minted tokens can manage users.
2. **Token transits state.** The hashicorp/vault provider (5.6.0) exposes ephemeral resources for KV only, not dynamic engine creds, so the mint is read via the `vault_generic_secret` DATA source: the short-lived token is written to state (sensitive, lease-revoked) and re-minted each plan. Migrate to an ephemeral resource once the vault provider ships a dynamic-secret one.
3. **A clean single fresh apply is not possible.** A provider cannot be configured from a role created in the same run (data sources don't defer; OpenTofu 1.11 defers only ephemeral resources, which the vault provider doesn't offer here). So enabling the dynamic path on a backend needs a one-time targeted bootstrap of the mount + role, then normal applies. Documented in `config/netbox_secret_backend/netbox.yaml`.
## Operator follow-up
- Repair the live mount first (unchanged): `vault write netbox/config token=<BARE>` (the mount uses `ignore_changes=[token]`), keep `token_version=2`.
- To enable dynamic minting: set `user_mgmt_username` to the pre-existing superuser, apply the deployer creds policy, then bootstrap once: `tofu apply -target=...netbox_secret_backend -target=...netbox_user_mgmt_role`, then apply normally. Until then user management stays on the static token (non-breaking, with a warning).
Reviewed-on: #119
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
## Why
- The netbox engine modules stand ready but mount nothing and create no identity until backend and role data exist, so terraform-infra still reads a static NetBox token instead of minting ephemeral scoped tokens.
## How
- Add `config/netbox_secret_backend/netbox.yaml` to mount the engine at `netbox` and point it at the syd1 NetBox URL; the admin token is read from KV, not stored here.
- Add `config/netbox_secret_backend_role/netbox/terraform-infra.yaml` as the single declarative source for the terraform-infra identity: filename-derived role name and NetBox username, write access, short TTLs, and an inline permissions block. Nothing in the file repeats the filename.
- Scope terraform-infra to view/add/change/delete on the IPAM/DCIM objects it manages: prefixes, ip-addresses, ip-ranges, devices, interfaces, mac addresses.
- Add `policies/netbox/creds/terraform-infra.yaml` letting the terraform-infra AppRole and its Woodpecker k8s role read `netbox/creds/terraform-infra`; it attaches to nothing until the separate terraform-infra Vault onboarding lands.
## Dependency order
- Stacked on the modules PR (#115), which stacks on the plugin registration PR. Merge order: plugin -> #115 -> this.
## CI note
- The plan step is red only on the external admin_token KV seed at `kv/data/service/vault/au/syd1/secret_backend/netbox/config` (a NetBox token with add_token + grant_token / superuser). Seeding that path is an environmental prerequisite, not a code defect; everything else validates.
---------
Co-authored-by: BenVincent <benvin@main.unkin.net>
Reviewed-on: #117
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
## Why
- The netbox secrets engine mount + roles land in a follow-up PR (#115); its manage policy must exist first so the deployer can create the engine config and roles the moment that PR applies (policy-first split).
## How
- Add `policies/netbox/admin.yaml` granting the deployer `netbox/config`, `netbox/config/rotate` and `netbox/roles/*` (deliberately excludes `netbox/creds/*`), bound to the `tf_vault` AppRole and `woodpecker_terraform_vault` k8s role, mirroring the gpg/gitea admin policies.
Land this before #115 (the engine mount + roles).
Reviewed-on: #116
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Why: AI coding agents authenticate to Gitea as Ben using Ben's token. With the unkin-agent identity now in place (terraform-git PR #59), the agents AppRole should issue that account's tokens directly so agent commits and PRs are attributable and carry only least-privilege scopes.
How:
- add a gitea secrets-engine role minting ephemeral tokens for unkin-agent scoped to write:repository, write:issue, read:user — push branches and open PRs, never merge or administer
- add a policy granting read on gitea/creds/unkin-agent, bound to the agents AppRole, mirroring the agent-* Kubernetes creds bindings
Depends on terraform-git PR #59: the unkin-agent Gitea account must exist before minted tokens work. The vault-plugin-secrets-gitea engine is already live (plugin v0.1.0 registered, gitea mount configured), so no engine/plugin change is needed here.
Reviewed-on: #114
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Follow-up to the merged #111 (which shipped `kv/data/service/terraform/infra` read only).
`terraform-infra`'s providers.tf uses a `vault_kv_secret_v2` **data source**, which reads the kv-v2 **metadata** path on every plan/apply (same behaviour that 403'd a prior terraform-git apply — see `policies/kv/service/vault/.../gitea/config_write.yaml`). Add `kv/metadata/service/terraform/infra` read so the plan doesn't 403 once the secret is seeded.
Verified against terraform-infra PR #5: `skip_child_token` cleared the child-token 403 and the data-read policy works (plan now reaches "no secret found"); metadata read is the remaining policy gap before a seeded plan can pass.
https://claude.ai/code/session_01JUoARVdmhxKQHyyyp1pxeT
Reviewed-on: #113
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Follows the `terraform-ipam` -> `terraform-infra` repo rename. Renames the k8s auth role (`woodpecker_terraform_infra`), consul secret-backend role + ACL policy (`terraform-infra`, state path `infra/terraform/infra/*`), consul creds read policy, and kv read policy (`kv/service/terraform/infra`).
https://claude.ai/code/session_01JUoARVdmhxKQHyyyp1pxeT
Reviewed-on: #111
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Grants the `terraform-ipam` Woodpecker pipeline its Vault footprint, mirroring the `terraform-artifactapi` set plus a KV read for provider tokens.
- k8s auth role `woodpecker_terraform_ipam` (SA `terraform-ipam`, ns `woodpecker`)
- consul secret backend role `terraform-ipam` + ACL policy writing `infra/terraform/ipam/*`
- consul creds read policy
- kv read policy for `kv/service/terraform/ipam` (`netbox_token` + `kea_token`)
The KV secret itself still needs seeding before the pipeline can auth to NetBox/Kea.
https://claude.ai/code/session_01JUoARVdmhxKQHyyyp1pxeT
Reviewed-on: #110
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
## Why
Agentic workloads currently need cluster-admin/root kubeconfig contexts to do routine per-domain work. This adds domain-scoped, Vault-issued kubernetes credentials plus an `agents` AppRole so agents get least-privilege access instead of escalating.
## Changes
- Add `kubernetes_secret_backend_role` configs `agent-dhcp`, `agent-dns`, `agent-certs`, `agent-storage` (au/syd1):
- **agent-dhcp** (Role, ns `dhcp-system`): full verbs on `kea.unkin.net` CRDs; get/list/watch pods/services/configmaps/events + pods/log.
- **agent-dns** (`service_account_name` mode): mints tokens for the static `agent-dns` SA (argocd-apps#332) whose per-namespace RoleBindings confine access to bind-system/bind-internal/bind-external/externaldns. `allowed_kubernetes_namespaces: [bind-system]` (the SA's namespace).
- **agent-certs** (Role, ns `cert-manager`): full verbs on `cert-manager.io` + `acme.cert-manager.io` (closes the orders/challenges debugging gap); get/list/watch/delete secrets; get/list/watch pods + pods/log. Secret delete confined to `cert-manager`.
- **agent-storage** (Role, ns `cephrgw-system`): full verbs on `ceph.unkin.net` CRDs (buckets/bucketaccesses/objectstoreusers); get/list/watch pods + pods/log.
- Extend the `kubernetes_secret_backend_role` module with an optional `service_account_name`; when set, `generated_role_rules`/`kubernetes_role_type` are omitted (the SA's own bindings supply RBAC).
- Add creds policies for each role, bound to the `kubernetes_au_syd1_cluster_operator` ldap group (human kubectl use) and the `agents` AppRole (programmatic use).
- Add the `agents` AppRole (mirrors the certmanager approle schema): `bind_secret_id: false` (role_id-only login), `token_bound_cidrs: [10.10.12.200/32]` (agent workstation wg0 addr), deterministic role_id, 1h/4h TTLs.
- Add `policies/kv/kubernetes/agents.yaml` granting the AppRole create/read/update/list on `kv/data/kubernetes/*` + read/list on `kv/metadata/kubernetes/*` (no delete).
## Ordering
argocd-apps#332 (the `agent-dns` SA + ClusterRole + per-namespace RoleBindings) must sync **before** the `agent-dns` creds here are usable — Vault mints tokens for a service account that must already exist.
https://claude.ai/code/session_01JUoARVdmhxKQHyyyp1pxeT
Reviewed-on: #109
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
## Why
logarchiver encrypts archived logs to an OpenPGP key held in Vault's gpg engine so the private key never leaves Vault (retrieval delegates decryption to `gpg/decrypt/logarchive`, operator-only). This provisions the key and lets the service read only its public key.
## Changes
- Create gpg key `logarchive` (rsa-4096, non-exportable) in the `gpg` mount.
- Add k8s auth role `logging_logarchiver` bound to SA `logarchiver` in the `logging` namespace.
- Add policy granting `read` on `gpg/keys/logarchive` to that role (public key only; no decrypt/export).
Cross-repo: this must apply before the argocd-apps logarchiver Deployment (unkin/argocd-apps) can fetch the key.
https://claude.ai/code/session_015ur3i7D2azsMAWTSVABApv
---------
Co-authored-by: benvin <neotheo@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: #106
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
terraform-git's apply (pipeline 108) still fails: pipeline 107 actually wrote the seed but the post-create metadata read 403'd, so terraform tainted the resource — recovery is replace (delete+create), and delete was deliberately not granted. Withholding delete doesn't provide the write-once property anyway (that's lifecycle ignore_changes in terraform-git); it just breaks taint recovery and destroy.
- add delete on the kv data path for the gitea config seed
- add delete on the matching kv metadata path (full destroy support)
After merge+apply, restart the terraform-git apply once more — it will replace the tainted seed and go green, unblocking #101.
Reviewed-on: #104
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
terraform-git's main apply still fails after the skip_child_token fix (tfgit #48): the vault_kv_secret_v2 seed resource reads the kv-v2 metadata path during plan/apply, and the grant added in #102 covered kv/data only — Vault returns 403 on GET kv/metadata/.../secret_backend/gitea/config (terraform-git pipeline 107). This is the last blocker before the KV seed lands and terraform-vault #101 can apply.
- add read on kv/metadata/service/vault/au/syd1/secret_backend/gitea/config to the terraform-git seed policy
Reviewed-on: #103
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
## Why
terraform-git now provisions the `gitea-vault-admin` site-admin bot and writes its generated password to `kv/service/vault/au/syd1/secret_backend/gitea/config` (as `admin_username` + `admin_password`) so the gitea secrets engine can consume it at creation time. The `woodpecker_terraform_git` / `terraform_git` identity has no write access to that KV path, so its apply would 403 without this grant.
The deployer that *reads* the seed already has read access via `policies/kv/service/vault/secret_backends_read.yaml` (`kv/data/service/vault/+/+/secret_backend/*`), so only the write side is added here.
## Change
- Add `policies/kv/service/vault/au/syd1/secret_backend/gitea/config_write.yaml` granting `create`/`read`/`update` on the gitea config KV path to the `terraform_git` approle and `woodpecker_terraform_git` k8s role.
## Ordering
Merge + apply this before the terraform-git `benvin/gitea-vault-admin` PR applies (which performs the write). Files are disjoint from the other gitea terraform-vault PRs (#100, #101).
https://claude.ai/code/session_015ur3i7D2azsMAWTSVABApv
Reviewed-on: #102
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
## Why
The forthcoming `gitea_secret_backend` + role configuration (separate PR, `benvin/gitea-secret-engine`) is applied by terraform-vault under the deployment identity (`tf_vault` approle / `woodpecker_terraform_vault` k8s role). That identity has no access to the `gitea/` mount yet, so writing the engine's config and roles would 403. This mirrors `policies/rancher/admin.yaml`.
## Change
- Add `policies/gitea/admin.yaml` granting the deployer:
- create/read/update/delete on `gitea/config`
- create/update on `gitea/config/rotate-root` (write-only rotation trigger)
- full manage + list on `gitea/roles/*` (and list on `gitea/roles`)
- Deliberately excludes `gitea/creds/*` — minting tokens is for consumers, not the deployer.
- No new catalog or mount grant: plugin registration is already covered by the shared, sudo-protected wildcard in `policies/sys/plugins/catalog/admin.yaml`, and mounting uses the deployer's existing `sys/mounts/*` access — same as the rancher engine.
## Order
Merge and apply this **before** the `benvin/gitea-secret-engine` PR, so the deployer can write the engine config/roles on that apply.
https://claude.ai/code/session_015ur3i7D2azsMAWTSVABApv
Reviewed-on: #100
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
The new **terragrunt-enc** repo manages all encapi ENC data (statuses, roles, node classifications) via Terraform/Terragrunt and needs its own Vault/Consul plumbing, mirroring terraform-git and terraform-incus. This supersedes the dual-write approach in terraform-incus PR #39; the equivalent terraform-incus grant (PR #97) is being closed, so the encapi-token grant is created fresh here for the new approle.
Changes:
- Add approle role `terraform_enc` and k8s auth role `woodpecker_terraform_enc` (bound to the `terraform-enc` ServiceAccount in the `woodpecker` namespace) for CI auth.
- Add consul secret backend role `terraform-enc` plus its ACL rules granting `write` on `infra/terraform/enc/` (its terragrunt state prefix), and a policy letting both auth roles read `consul_root/au/syd1/creds/terraform-enc`.
- Grant both auth roles read on `kv/data/kubernetes/namespace/encapi/default/environment` (the ENCAPI_WRITE_TOKEN) so `make apply` can write to encapi via the encapi provider.
Reviewed-on: #98
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
## Why
Wiring the new Rancher token secrets engine into Vault. The deployer registers the plugin (sudo-protected `sys/plugins/catalog`) and configures the engine via the ranchervaultsecret provider, so it needs catalog + engine-path access. Mirrors #88 (gpg).
## Changes
- Add `policies/rancher/admin.yaml` granting the `tf_vault` approle and `woodpecker_terraform_vault` k8s role: catalog sudo on `vault-plugin-secrets-rancher`, and manage on `rancher/{config,service-accounts,roles}`.
## Merge order
Part 1 of 4. Merge before the plugin-import and backend PRs so apply doesn't 403. (Puppet install + this policy first, then import, then backend.)
---------
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <neotheo@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: #91
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
## Why
Applying the gpg mount (#87) needs two grants the deployer (`tf_vault` approle / `woodpecker_terraform_vault` k8s role) doesn't have. terraform-vault **registers the plugin itself** (`vault_plugin` → `sys/plugins/catalog`, a sudo-protected path) and **manages keys** via the gpgvaultsecret provider (`gpg/keys/*`). The deployer already has `sys/mounts/*` but neither of these, so apply would 403 on the plugin registration and on `gpg/keys` writes — the same failure mode as #84.
## Changes
- Add `policies/gpg/admin.yaml` granting:
- `create/read/update/delete/sudo` on `sys/plugins/catalog/secret/vault-plugin-secrets-gpg` — to **import** (register/deregister) the plugin.
- full management of `gpg/keys/*` (+ `gpg/keys` list) — to **manage keys**.
- assigned to `tf_vault` (approle) + `woodpecker_terraform_vault` (k8s/au/syd1), mirroring `policies/litellm/admin.yaml` (#84).
Should merge/apply **before** #87 so the deployer can register the plugin and create the `pass` key.
Reviewed-on: #88
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
## Why
The new `terraform-rancher` repo (manages Rancher's Authentik OIDC auth via the rancher2 provider) needs Vault auth + Consul state, mirroring the terraform-authentik runner (#78/#81/#82).
## Change
- `AppRole/terraform_rancher` + k8s auth role `woodpecker_terraform_rancher` (SA terraform-rancher in the woodpecker ns).
- Consul secret-backend role + ACL policy (`resources/secret_backend/consul_root/au/syd1/terraform-rancher.hcl`) granting write to the `infra/terraform/rancher/` state prefix.
- Vault policies: read the Rancher admin API token (`kv/service/terraform/rancher`) and the keycloakoidc client secret (`kv/kubernetes/namespace/cattle-system/default/oauth-credentials`), plus the consul_root state creds.
Scoped the OAuth read to the `cattle-system` path specifically (rather than the `+` wildcard the authentik policy uses) since the Rancher runner only needs its own app's secret.
## Validation
pre-commit (terragrunt-hcl-fmt + yamllint) passed. CI plan will confirm.
Reviewed-on: #86
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
## Why
Applying the newly-merged litellm mount (#83) failed at apply time with:
```
Error: failed to write litellm config
URL: PUT https://vault.service.consul:8200/v1/litellm/config
Code: 403. * permission denied
```
The deployer identity (`tf_vault` approle / `woodpecker_terraform_vault` k8s role) can enable the mount via `sys/mounts/admin`, but no policy grants it access to the engine's own data paths, so writing the config and roles is denied.
## Changes
- Add `policies/litellm/admin.yaml` granting `create`/`read`/`update`/`delete` on `litellm/config` and `litellm/roles/*` (plus `read`/`list` on `litellm/roles`), assigned to the same auth roles as the other secret-engine admin policies (`tf_vault`, `woodpecker_terraform_vault`).
## Note
The policy attaches to the deployer's auth roles, so it takes effect on the next token issuance — a re-run of the apply (fresh Vault login) will have the permission and can write `litellm/config` and the roles.
Reviewed-on: #84
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
## Why
terraform-authentik's provider needs an Authentik API token (`TF_VAR_authentik_token`), now sourced from Vault at `kv/service/terraform/authentik` (Makefile wiring in terraform-authentik #2). The CI role needs read access to that path.
## Change
Extend `policies/kv/service/terraform/authentik.yaml` to also grant read on `kv/data/service/terraform/authentik` for the `terraform_authentik` approle + `woodpecker_terraform_authentik` k8s role.
Reviewed-on: #82
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
## Why
terraform-authentik now reads OAuth2 client secrets from Vault (`data.vault_kv_secret_v2`) rather than committing them (terraform-authentik #2). But the `terraform_authentik` approle / `woodpecker_terraform_authentik` k8s role only had the consul-creds policy, so `plan` fails with permission denied on the grafana oauth path.
## Change
Add `policies/kv/service/terraform/authentik.yaml` granting read on `kv/data/kubernetes/namespace/+/default/oauth-credentials` for both the approle and the woodpecker k8s role.
Reviewed-on: #81
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Add Kubernetes auth roles, AppRole configs, Consul secret backend roles, Consul ACL policies, and Vault kv read policies for terraform-sonarr, terraform-radarr, and terraform-prowlarr.
Reviewed-on: #79
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
## Summary
- K8s auth role for Woodpecker CI (`terraform-authentik` SA in `woodpecker` namespace)
- AppRole for local terraform runs
- Consul secret backend role (`terraform-authentik`, TTL 120/300)
- Consul ACL policy for `infra/terraform/authentik/` key prefix
- Vault policy granting both auth methods access to Consul creds
Reviewed-on: #78
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
enable the terraform-artifactapi system to manage its state in consul
using dynamic credentials from kubernetes ci jobs in woodpecker
---------
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Reviewed-on: #77
## Summary
- Add read policy for kv/data/service/gitea/webhook/* path
- Assigned to terraform_git approle and woodpecker_terraform_git k8s auth role
- Webhook URLs are stored in Vault KV and read at plan/apply time
## Test plan
- [ ] Verify terragrunt plan succeeds for terraform-git after merge
Reviewed-on: #75
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
- add approle for terraform-git
- add policy to read gitadmin token
- update access to the terraform-git consul token
---------
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Reviewed-on: #74
## Summary
- Add K8s auth role woodpecker_terraform_git for CI pipeline authentication
- Add consul secret backend role terraform-git for consul state storage tokens
- Add consul ACL policy granting write access to infra/terraform/git/ key prefix
- Add vault policy for reading consul creds at consul_root/au/syd1/creds/terraform-git
## Test plan
- [ ] Verify terragrunt plan succeeds
- [ ] Verify consul ACL policy is created correctly
- [ ] Verify K8s auth role can authenticate from woodpecker namespace
Reviewed-on: #73
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
vault's terraform approle doesnt need to access all of these kubernetes
roles, it was just added as a placeholder and access to the kubernetes
roles was via the `vault_admin` to-much-access account. this is an
effort to roll back that and make access more targeted.
- add kubernetes* ldap groups for specific cluster/role combinations
- remove tf_vault from kubernetes* roles
- add approle for kubernetes terraform
- ensure it can access consul token for state storage
- ensure it can generate root token for managing kubernetes
move management of Vault back to tf_vault approle. for this, we need to
create a number of policies that are missing.
- add policies to manage consul secret engines
- add policies to manage pki secret engines
- add policies to manage kv secret engines
- add policies to manage ssh secret engines
This commit message captures the major architectural change of implementing Consul ACL management
with proper provider aliasing, along with the supporting configuration files and policy definitions
for various terraform services.
- add consul_acl_management module to manage consul acl policies and roles
- add consul backend roles and policies for terraform services (incus, k8s, nomad, repoflow, vault)
- add consul provider configuration to root.hcl
- add policies to generate credentials for each role
- simplify consul_secret_backend_role module to reference acl-managed roles
- switch to opentofu for provider foreach support
- update terragrunt configuration to support consul backend aliases
- update pre-commit hooks to use opentofu instead of terraform
- configure tflint exceptions for consul acl management module
unkin-agent
unkinben
benvin