Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
unkinben 96a6a7d728 gitea: add the gitea token secrets engine (mount, config, teabot roles) (#101)
ci/woodpecker/push/apply Pipeline was successful
## Why

teabot's implementer and reviewer bot users should mint **ephemeral, scoped Gitea tokens** on demand rather than holding standing personal access tokens — Gitea tokens never expire on their own, so a leak lasts until someone notices. This registers and mounts the new `vault-plugin-secrets-gitea` engine (released v0.1.0) and declares its roles, mirroring the rancher engine wiring.

## Change

- Register the plugin in the catalog (`config/plugins/vault-plugin-secrets-gitea.yaml`), pinned to the released v0.1.0 binary `sha256 8f67fbc216effada5fd7399888a710b62fad83be0b31761a439e7dec3d56509b` (sha256 of `/opt/openbao-plugins/vault-plugin-secrets-gitea` from the released `openbao-plugin-secrets-gitea-0.1.0` RPM).
- Add `gitea_secret_backend` + `gitea_secret_backend_role` modules and wire them through `config.hcl`, `environments/au/syd1/terragrunt.hcl`, and `modules/vault_cluster` variables/main, using the `giteavaultsecret` provider from the `terraform-unkin` registry (v0.1.0).
- Mount the engine at `gitea/` against `https://git.unkin.net`; seeded site-admin credentials are read from KV (`service/vault/au/syd1/secret_backend/gitea/config`, keys `admin_username`/`admin_password`) — not stored in git.
- **The seed is consumed create-only**: `lifecycle ignore_changes` on `admin_username`/`admin_password` means the engine reads the KV seed only when first creating `gitea/config`. After `rotate-root` diverges the live password from the seed, a later apply never pushes the stale seed back.
- Add roles with conservative, minimal scopes (write: implies read:):
  - `teabot-implementer` — `write:repository`, `write:issue` (clone/push, open PRs, comment).
  - `teabot-reviewer` — `read:repository`, `write:issue` (read diffs, post PR reviews/comments).
- TTLs: `ttl` 1h / `max_ttl` 4h on both roles.

## The site-admin bot + KV seed are now provisioned by Terraform (no manual gap)

Per Ben's review, creating the site-admin bot and seeding its credential is no longer a manual step:

- **terraform-git #46** creates the `gitea-vault-admin` site-admin bot and writes its generated password **once** to `kv/service/vault/au/syd1/secret_backend/gitea/config` (create-only KV write; never updated).
- **terraform-vault #102** grants terraform-git write access to that KV path.

## Ordering (merge + apply)

1. **puppet-prod #498** — installs the plugin binary on the vault nodes (Puppet must run).
2. **terraform-vault #100** (`benvin/gitea-deployer-access`) — deployer access to the gitea mount.
3. **terraform-vault #102** (`benvin/gitea-kv-writer`) — terraform-git KV write grant.
4. **terraform-git #46** (`benvin/gitea-vault-admin`) — creates the bot + seeds KV.
5. **This PR** — mounts the engine (reads the seed) and declares roles.

Files here are disjoint from #100 and #102 (no conflict).

**CI note:** the plan for this PR may hard-fail in CI if the plugin isn't yet registered/installed or the KV seed isn't present in the plan's target. If CI plan fails for that ordering reason, that is expected — do not force; apply only once steps 1–4 are live.

## Remaining manual step (one, ordered)

After this PR's first apply, run `vault write -f gitea/config/rotate-root` so the standing seed password is replaced by one only Vault holds. (On future binary upgrades, bump the RPM version in puppet-prod and the catalog `sha256` here together, then `vault write sys/plugins/reload/backend plugin=vault-plugin-secrets-gitea`.)

https://claude.ai/code/session_015ur3i7D2azsMAWTSVABApv
Reviewed-on: #101
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
2026-07-27 23:42:13 +10:00
unkinben dcc73131a4 Bump rancher plugin catalog to v0.1.1 (bearerToken fix) (#96)
ci/woodpecker/push/apply Pipeline was successful
## Why

v0.1.0 of the rancher plugin minted non-functional tokens — it returned `status.value` (the secret fragment) instead of `status.bearerToken` (`ext/<name>:<secret>`), so every cred and every root rotation 401'd against Rancher. Fixed in plugin v0.1.1 (PR #2, released).

## Changes

- `config/plugins/vault-plugin-secrets-rancher.yaml` sha256 → v0.1.1 binary `9e597cd9…d5955` (verified against both v0.1.1 RPMs). Re-registers the catalog entry so OpenBao launches the fixed binary.

## Deploy coordination

1. Puppet installs the v0.1.1 RPM on the vault nodes (separate puppet-prod PR).
2. Merge this → apply re-registers the catalog with the new sha.
3. `vault plugin reload -plugin=vault-plugin-secrets-rancher` so the running plugin swaps to v0.1.1 (its sha must match this catalog entry).

---------

Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <neotheo@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: #96
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
2026-07-18 22:59:35 +10:00
unkinben 193c17d1bc Manage the litellm plugin via config/plugins (import existing registration) (#90)
ci/woodpecker/push/apply Pipeline was successful
Bring the litellm plugin under terraform management like the gpg one, using the new plugin-import module (#89).

## Why
The litellm plugin was registered **manually** before terraform owned the catalog. If we just add it to `config/plugins/`, the first apply tries to *create* a catalog entry that already exists and fails. So its state must be imported first.

## Changes
- Add `config/plugins/vault-plugin-secrets-litellm.yaml` (`sha256` = released **v0.1.1** openbao binary from the RPM Puppet installs).

## Manual pre-step (before apply)
Import the existing registration into state, and verify the sha matches the live catalog:
```sh
cd environments/au/syd1
# confirm the live sha first:
bao read sys/plugins/catalog/secret/vault-plugin-secrets-litellm
# import into state:
terragrunt import \
  'module.plugin["vault-plugin-secrets-litellm"].vault_plugin.this' \
  secret/vault-plugin-secrets-litellm
```
If the live sha differs from the yaml, update the yaml to match (or expect a benign re-register to the on-disk v0.1.1 sha). Needs the deployer's plugin-catalog access (#88, already merged).

Reviewed-on: #90
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
2026-07-18 14:55:33 +10:00
unkinben 03e9baf17f Register the rancher plugin in the catalog (import) (#92)
ci/woodpecker/push/apply Pipeline was successful
## Why

Register the released v0.1.0 rancher secrets plugin so the engine can be mounted. Uses the existing config/plugins discovery + plugin module (added for gpg in #89). Mirrors #90 (litellm import).

## Changes

- Add `config/plugins/vault-plugin-secrets-rancher.yaml` (`type: secret`, `command: vault-plugin-secrets-rancher`, `sha256` pinned to the released binary `d2b17f45…ec574a`, verified against both the vault and openbao v0.1.0 RPMs).

## Merge order

Part 2 of 4. Requires the binary on disk (puppet-prod install) and the deployer policy (#91). Merge before the backend PR.

---------

Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <neotheo@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: #92
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
2026-07-18 14:47:08 +10:00
unkinben 3d59758324 Add a plugin-import module + config/plugins for catalog registration (#89)
ci/woodpecker/push/apply Pipeline was canceled
Split plugin catalog registration out of the per-engine backend modules into its own concern (previously bundled into #87's gpg_secret_backend).

## Changes
- New generic `plugin` module (`vault_plugin`: type/name/command/sha256/plugin_version) that imports a binary into the catalog.
- New `config/plugins/` discovery group (filename = catalog name = mount type), wired through `vault_cluster` (`plugins` variable + module) and the syd1 environment.
- `config/plugins/vault-plugin-secrets-gpg.yaml` pins the released v0.1.0 binary sha256 (`0e92d740…a7b20`, from the published RPM). Puppet installs the RPM floating, so bump this in lockstep on upgrade.

Any engine now registers its plugin by dropping a file in `config/plugins/`; its `*_secret_backend` module just mounts the registered type.

Needs the deployer's plugin-catalog access (#88). Merge order: **#88 → this → #87**.

Reviewed-on: #89
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
2026-07-17 23:08:04 +10:00