Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
unkin-agent 6c489c6003 Bump arrstack plugin catalog to v0.2.0 (#144)
ci/woodpecker/push/apply Pipeline was successful
## Why

The v0.2.0 arrstack plugin binary is live on all five OpenBao nodes (RPM applied via post-merge puppet runs), and the catalog still pins the v0.1.0 sha — OpenBao refuses to launch a plugin whose binary hash does not match the catalog entry.

## Changes

- `config/plugins/vault-plugin-secrets-arrstack.yaml`: `version` -> `0.2.0` and `sha256` -> `9ea7f160…12fa1`, computed from the binary extracted from `openbao-plugin-secrets-arrstack-0.2.0-1.x86_64.rpm` (the same RPM puppet pins).

## Post-apply

Run `vault plugin reload -plugin=vault-plugin-secrets-arrstack` after the apply so the running mount swaps to the v0.2.0 binary.

Reviewed-on: #144
Co-authored-by: unkin-agent <unkin-agent@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: unkin-agent <unkin-agent@unkin.net>
2026-08-30 17:07:28 +10:00
unkin-agent df0510e33b vault: register vault-plugin-secrets-arrstack in the catalog (1/3) (#125)
ci/woodpecker/push/apply Pipeline failed
## Why

Splits the arrstack Vault engine work (was #124) into three independently-appliable PRs so registration, policy, and engine resources are never bundled. This is **PR 1 of 3 (register)**.

## Change

- Registers the `vault-plugin-secrets-arrstack` plugin (v0.1.0) in the OpenBao plugin catalog via `config/plugins/vault-plugin-secrets-arrstack.yaml`.
- `sha256` pins the released v0.1.0 binary.
- No wiring changes needed: the `plugins` glob and `module.plugin` already exist on `master`.

## Apply order

Apply this **after** the Puppet plugin-install PR (unkin/puppet-prod #521, merged) has placed the binary at `/opt/openbao-plugins/vault-plugin-secrets-arrstack` on the OpenBao nodes. Registration fails until the binary is present on-node.

## Stack

1. **register (this PR)** -> `benvin/arrstack-register` off `master`
2. policy -> `benvin/arrstack-policy`
3. resources -> `benvin/arrstack-resources`

Supersedes #124.

Reviewed-on: #125
Co-authored-by: unkin-agent <unkin-agent@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: unkin-agent <unkin-agent@unkin.net>
2026-08-19 21:50:55 +10:00
unkin-agent 5084a53015 vault: register ghp plugin in the catalog (config/plugins only) (#123)
ci/woodpecker/push/apply Pipeline was successful
Why: step 3 of the ordered ghp plugin add — register vault-plugin-secrets-ghp in the OpenBao plugin catalog as its own atomic change, before the engine is mounted/configured.

How: add config/plugins/vault-plugin-secrets-ghp.yaml (type: secret; sha256 pins the v0.1.0 binary installed by puppet-prod#520). config/plugins/* is generically discovered by config.hcl, so this is the only file. Catalog import is covered by the shared sudo-protected sys/plugins/catalog grant.

Order: puppet-prod#520 (install) -> terraform-vault#122 (config-write policy, merged) -> **this** (catalog) -> terraform-vault#121 (mount + config + role).
Reviewed-on: #123
Co-authored-by: unkin-agent <unkin-agent@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: unkin-agent <unkin-agent@unkin.net>
2026-08-16 15:43:18 +10:00
unkinben d080279728 Register the netbox secrets plugin in the catalog (#118)
ci/woodpecker/push/apply Pipeline was successful
## Why

- The netbox secrets engine cannot be mounted until its plugin binary is registered in the OpenBao catalog, so the catalog entry must land before any engine mount or role config references it.

## How

- Add `config/plugins/vault-plugin-secrets-netbox.yaml` registering the plugin as a secret plugin, pinned to the released v0.1.0 binary sha256 that Puppet installs on the OpenBao nodes. Bump the sha in lockstep with any RPM upgrade.

## Dependency order

- First of three stacked PRs: this plugin registration, then the netbox modules + wiring (#115), then the netbox backend + terraform-infra role (#117). Merges to master independently.

Reviewed-on: #118
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
2026-08-09 16:30:06 +10:00
unkinben 96a6a7d728 gitea: add the gitea token secrets engine (mount, config, teabot roles) (#101)
ci/woodpecker/push/apply Pipeline was successful
## Why

teabot's implementer and reviewer bot users should mint **ephemeral, scoped Gitea tokens** on demand rather than holding standing personal access tokens — Gitea tokens never expire on their own, so a leak lasts until someone notices. This registers and mounts the new `vault-plugin-secrets-gitea` engine (released v0.1.0) and declares its roles, mirroring the rancher engine wiring.

## Change

- Register the plugin in the catalog (`config/plugins/vault-plugin-secrets-gitea.yaml`), pinned to the released v0.1.0 binary `sha256 8f67fbc216effada5fd7399888a710b62fad83be0b31761a439e7dec3d56509b` (sha256 of `/opt/openbao-plugins/vault-plugin-secrets-gitea` from the released `openbao-plugin-secrets-gitea-0.1.0` RPM).
- Add `gitea_secret_backend` + `gitea_secret_backend_role` modules and wire them through `config.hcl`, `environments/au/syd1/terragrunt.hcl`, and `modules/vault_cluster` variables/main, using the `giteavaultsecret` provider from the `terraform-unkin` registry (v0.1.0).
- Mount the engine at `gitea/` against `https://git.unkin.net`; seeded site-admin credentials are read from KV (`service/vault/au/syd1/secret_backend/gitea/config`, keys `admin_username`/`admin_password`) — not stored in git.
- **The seed is consumed create-only**: `lifecycle ignore_changes` on `admin_username`/`admin_password` means the engine reads the KV seed only when first creating `gitea/config`. After `rotate-root` diverges the live password from the seed, a later apply never pushes the stale seed back.
- Add roles with conservative, minimal scopes (write: implies read:):
  - `teabot-implementer` — `write:repository`, `write:issue` (clone/push, open PRs, comment).
  - `teabot-reviewer` — `read:repository`, `write:issue` (read diffs, post PR reviews/comments).
- TTLs: `ttl` 1h / `max_ttl` 4h on both roles.

## The site-admin bot + KV seed are now provisioned by Terraform (no manual gap)

Per Ben's review, creating the site-admin bot and seeding its credential is no longer a manual step:

- **terraform-git #46** creates the `gitea-vault-admin` site-admin bot and writes its generated password **once** to `kv/service/vault/au/syd1/secret_backend/gitea/config` (create-only KV write; never updated).
- **terraform-vault #102** grants terraform-git write access to that KV path.

## Ordering (merge + apply)

1. **puppet-prod #498** — installs the plugin binary on the vault nodes (Puppet must run).
2. **terraform-vault #100** (`benvin/gitea-deployer-access`) — deployer access to the gitea mount.
3. **terraform-vault #102** (`benvin/gitea-kv-writer`) — terraform-git KV write grant.
4. **terraform-git #46** (`benvin/gitea-vault-admin`) — creates the bot + seeds KV.
5. **This PR** — mounts the engine (reads the seed) and declares roles.

Files here are disjoint from #100 and #102 (no conflict).

**CI note:** the plan for this PR may hard-fail in CI if the plugin isn't yet registered/installed or the KV seed isn't present in the plan's target. If CI plan fails for that ordering reason, that is expected — do not force; apply only once steps 1–4 are live.

## Remaining manual step (one, ordered)

After this PR's first apply, run `vault write -f gitea/config/rotate-root` so the standing seed password is replaced by one only Vault holds. (On future binary upgrades, bump the RPM version in puppet-prod and the catalog `sha256` here together, then `vault write sys/plugins/reload/backend plugin=vault-plugin-secrets-gitea`.)

https://claude.ai/code/session_015ur3i7D2azsMAWTSVABApv
Reviewed-on: #101
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
2026-07-27 23:42:13 +10:00
unkinben dcc73131a4 Bump rancher plugin catalog to v0.1.1 (bearerToken fix) (#96)
ci/woodpecker/push/apply Pipeline was successful
## Why

v0.1.0 of the rancher plugin minted non-functional tokens — it returned `status.value` (the secret fragment) instead of `status.bearerToken` (`ext/<name>:<secret>`), so every cred and every root rotation 401'd against Rancher. Fixed in plugin v0.1.1 (PR #2, released).

## Changes

- `config/plugins/vault-plugin-secrets-rancher.yaml` sha256 → v0.1.1 binary `9e597cd9…d5955` (verified against both v0.1.1 RPMs). Re-registers the catalog entry so OpenBao launches the fixed binary.

## Deploy coordination

1. Puppet installs the v0.1.1 RPM on the vault nodes (separate puppet-prod PR).
2. Merge this → apply re-registers the catalog with the new sha.
3. `vault plugin reload -plugin=vault-plugin-secrets-rancher` so the running plugin swaps to v0.1.1 (its sha must match this catalog entry).

---------

Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <neotheo@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: #96
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
2026-07-18 22:59:35 +10:00
unkinben 193c17d1bc Manage the litellm plugin via config/plugins (import existing registration) (#90)
ci/woodpecker/push/apply Pipeline was successful
Bring the litellm plugin under terraform management like the gpg one, using the new plugin-import module (#89).

## Why
The litellm plugin was registered **manually** before terraform owned the catalog. If we just add it to `config/plugins/`, the first apply tries to *create* a catalog entry that already exists and fails. So its state must be imported first.

## Changes
- Add `config/plugins/vault-plugin-secrets-litellm.yaml` (`sha256` = released **v0.1.1** openbao binary from the RPM Puppet installs).

## Manual pre-step (before apply)
Import the existing registration into state, and verify the sha matches the live catalog:
```sh
cd environments/au/syd1
# confirm the live sha first:
bao read sys/plugins/catalog/secret/vault-plugin-secrets-litellm
# import into state:
terragrunt import \
  'module.plugin["vault-plugin-secrets-litellm"].vault_plugin.this' \
  secret/vault-plugin-secrets-litellm
```
If the live sha differs from the yaml, update the yaml to match (or expect a benign re-register to the on-disk v0.1.1 sha). Needs the deployer's plugin-catalog access (#88, already merged).

Reviewed-on: #90
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
2026-07-18 14:55:33 +10:00
unkinben 03e9baf17f Register the rancher plugin in the catalog (import) (#92)
ci/woodpecker/push/apply Pipeline was successful
## Why

Register the released v0.1.0 rancher secrets plugin so the engine can be mounted. Uses the existing config/plugins discovery + plugin module (added for gpg in #89). Mirrors #90 (litellm import).

## Changes

- Add `config/plugins/vault-plugin-secrets-rancher.yaml` (`type: secret`, `command: vault-plugin-secrets-rancher`, `sha256` pinned to the released binary `d2b17f45…ec574a`, verified against both the vault and openbao v0.1.0 RPMs).

## Merge order

Part 2 of 4. Requires the binary on disk (puppet-prod install) and the deployer policy (#91). Merge before the backend PR.

---------

Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <neotheo@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: #92
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
2026-07-18 14:47:08 +10:00
unkinben 3d59758324 Add a plugin-import module + config/plugins for catalog registration (#89)
ci/woodpecker/push/apply Pipeline was canceled
Split plugin catalog registration out of the per-engine backend modules into its own concern (previously bundled into #87's gpg_secret_backend).

## Changes
- New generic `plugin` module (`vault_plugin`: type/name/command/sha256/plugin_version) that imports a binary into the catalog.
- New `config/plugins/` discovery group (filename = catalog name = mount type), wired through `vault_cluster` (`plugins` variable + module) and the syd1 environment.
- `config/plugins/vault-plugin-secrets-gpg.yaml` pins the released v0.1.0 binary sha256 (`0e92d740…a7b20`, from the published RPM). Puppet installs the RPM floating, so bump this in lockstep on upgrade.

Any engine now registers its plugin by dropping a file in `config/plugins/`; its `*_secret_backend` module just mounts the registered type.

Needs the deployer's plugin-catalog access (#88). Merge order: **#88 → this → #87**.

Reviewed-on: #89
Co-authored-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
Co-committed-by: Ben Vincent <ben@unkin.net>
2026-07-17 23:08:04 +10:00