Split the probe-reply kinds cleanly in the README
ci/woodpecker/pr/build Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/test Pipeline was successful
ci/woodpecker/pr/pre-commit Pipeline was successful

This commit is contained in:
2026-09-06 00:56:01 +10:00
parent e16ca9b701
commit ac0a2c32ae
+3 -3
View File
@@ -228,13 +228,13 @@ not answering.
or `unknown` counts as a failure. A body that is not in that shape is judged on
its status code alone, so pointing `health_probe_path` at some other endpoint
still works.
- **A refused probe is not a sick backend.** Only evidence about the *backend*
takes it out of the pool: a transport failure (connection refused, DNS, TLS,
- **A refused probe is not a sick backend.** Probe replies split in two. Evidence
about the *backend* is a transport failure (connection refused, DNS, TLS,
timeout), a `5xx` — `503` included, since trapperkeeper answers `503` exactly
when its services are not nominal — or a `429`, which is the backend reporting
its own capacity rather than judging the request, so an overloaded backend gets
backed off instead of kept at full traffic. A reply that refuses the *probe
request* is evidence about the probe instead: the other `4xx` are the backend
request* is evidence about the probe: the other `4xx` are the backend
answering that our request is the problem (`404`/`410` the path is not there,
`405` it does not take a `GET`, `401`/`403` we are not allowed to ask), and
`501` says it does not implement the endpoint.